Articles
Extractables & leachables: the genotoxicity dimension of E&L
A drug product is only as safe as everything it touches on the way to the patient. Container-closure systems, single-use manufacturing components, delivery devices and packaging can all shed trace chemicals into a medicine — and some of those chemicals can be DNA-reactive. This is why extractables and leachables (E&L) assessment so often turns on a single, decisive endpoint: genotoxicity.
Because mutagenic substances carry extraordinarily low acceptable limits, the genotoxic risk from a leachable frequently sets the tightest specification in the whole safety assessment. This article explains the E&L genotoxicity workflow, the thresholds involved, and the standards that govern it.
Key points
Extractables vs leachables
Genotoxicity often drives it
The TTC anchor
Predict, then confirm
Extractables and leachables: the difference that matters
Extractables are substances that can be pulled out of a material under exaggerated conditions (aggressive solvents, heat, time) — a worst-case inventory of what might migrate. Leachables are the substances that actually do migrate into the drug product (or reach the patient) under real, normal-use conditions. Extractables studies map the hazard space; leachables studies confirm the real-world exposure.
The safety question for each identified compound is the same one that runs through all of genetic toxicology: could this substance damage DNA?
At a glance
1.5 µg/day
The ICH M7 threshold applied to DNA-reactive (mutagenic) leachables
AET
Analytical Evaluation Threshold — the level above which compounds must be identified and assessed
USP 1663 / 1664
The framework guidance for extractables and leachables
ISO 10993-18
Chemical characterisation for the medical-device side of E&L
The genotoxicity workflow in E&L
- Chemical characterisation — an extractables study identifies and semi-quantifies the compounds present, down to the Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET).
- Toxicological assessment — each identified compound is evaluated, with mutagenicity assessed first because it carries the lowest limits.
- (Q)SAR screening — structure-based prediction (per ICH M7) flags DNA-reactive alerts.
- Control or confirm — flagged compounds are either controlled below the relevant threshold (e.g. 1.5 µg/day) or tested (Ames, OECD 471) to resolve the alert.
- Leachables study — real-use migration is measured on the actual product to confirm exposures against the limits.
The standards that govern it
E&L genotoxicity sits at the intersection of several frameworks: USP <1663> and <1664> for extractables and leachables, ICH M7 for DNA-reactive impurities and the TTC, and — on the medical-device side — ISO 10993-18 (chemical characterisation), ISO 10993-17 (toxicological risk / allowable limits) and ISO 10993-33 (genotoxicity). Combination products and single-use systems draw on all of them, which is why an integrated approach pays off.
Frequently asked questions
What are extractables and leachables?
Extractables are substances that can migrate from a material under exaggerated conditions; leachables are those that actually migrate into the drug product or reach the patient under normal use. Extractables map the hazard; leachables confirm real exposure.
Why does genotoxicity matter so much in E&L?
Mutagenic (DNA-reactive) leachables carry very low acceptable limits — anchored to the ICH M7 threshold of 1.5 µg/day — so they frequently set the tightest specification in the entire safety assessment.
How are mutagenic leachables assessed?
Identified compounds are screened by (Q)SAR for DNA-reactive structural alerts; flagged compounds are either controlled below the relevant threshold or confirmed by testing such as the Ames assay, then verified against real leachables data.
Which standards apply to E&L genotoxicity?
USP <1663>/<1664> for extractables and leachables, ICH M7 for DNA-reactive impurities, and — for medical devices — ISO 10993-18, -17 and -33.
De-risk your materials with GenEvolutioN
GenEvolutioN brings genotoxicity expertise to extractables and leachables programmes — (Q)SAR assessment of identified compounds and GLP confirmatory testing — so mutagenic risk is caught early and controlled with confidence.
See how this connects to genotoxicity fundamentals and impurity control, or talk to our team.
Have a regulatory toxicology project?
Our team supports you across all your in vitro studies — OECD methods, REACH dossiers, biocides, cosmetics.
Discuss your project